Article Date: 01 Aug 2013 - 0:00 PDT Current ratings for:
UK government's delay on plain tobacco packaging: how much evidence is enough?
On bmj.com today, senior research fellow Crawford Moodie asks how much more evidence is needed before the UK government make a decision on plain tobacco packaging.
In July, the UK government announced that there would be a delay on the decision on plain packaging, until findings from Australia emerge. The first study from Australia published since plain packaging came into effect found that smokers who used plain packs perceived their cigarettes to be "less satisfying and poorer quality" and "were more supportive of plain packaging and more likely to think about and to prioritise quitting".
Past research shows that desire to quit is a "reliable predictor" of whether someone tries to stop smoking with studies showing that high motivation is an important factor in quitting.
Moodie draws on the findings from the Australian study which he says supports one of the UK Government's public health policy priorities, namely to encourage smokers to quit, but questions whether they are enough to influence UK policy. He says that there is a "rapidly growing body of evidence on this issue" which is consistent in its findings: plain packaging would reduce appeal; increase the effectiveness of health warnings and reduce the ability of packaging to mislead consumers about the harmful effects of smoking.
The European Parliament's Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety supports pictorial health warnings covering 75% of the front and back of tobacco packaging, which should help reduce "pack appeal, enhance the visibility of warnings and disrupt tobacco companies' ability to communicate with consumers". However, Moodie argues that larger warnings would "not be enough" to prevent manufacturers using the "design of packaging and branding to detract from these warnings" or prevent consumers "being confused about the harms of the products". He points to the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, which suggests that "only plain packaging can do this".
Moodie says that most smokers become addicted to smoking in childhood and recent figures show that the habit among children continues to fall in England and has steadily fallen since the introduction of tobacco control measures outlined in the 1998 white paper Smoking Kills. He adds however, that there is no guarantee, "this decline will continue if a tobacco control strategy is not sustained".
He concludes that as packaging is the "key marketing and communications tool for tobacco companies" since advertising, promotion and sponsorship was banned, "standardised packaging would appear to be a logical next step".
Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release. Click 'references' tab above for source.Visit our smoking / quit smoking section for the latest news on this subject. Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:
MLA
1 Aug. 2013.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
'UK government's delay on plain tobacco packaging: how much evidence is enough?'
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam). We reserve the right to amend opinions where we deem necessary.
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.
No comments:
Post a Comment